Students Still the Target of Credit Card Offers, Despite Regulations

Posted by credit.com | Credit Card Blog | Friday 30 March 2012 9:00 am

Federal laws now prohibit certain types of marketing for credit cards that targets consumers under the age of 21, but lenders are still working around many protections and finding ways to continue extending offers to young adults.

Though the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act prevents many of credit card issuers’ favorite marketing tricks from being used on college campuses, a lot of issuers are still finding ways to circumvent the new rules, according to a report from the Columbia Free-Times. One of the largest protections put forth by that 2009 law requires that young adults who want their own credit card either have a co-signer over the age of 21 or otherwise provide adequate proof of income. And the latter loophole is the one lenders target, because of how difficult it is to define.

[Credit Check Tool: Try Credit.com's Free Credit Report Card]

“When you really take a close look at the CARD Act, the eligibility requirements are not nearly as strict as one would have thought they would be,” University of South Carolina law professor Eboni Nelson told the newspaper. “You don’t have to show your ability to pay the full $1,000 or $2,000 credit limit [for example]. You may just have to pay the $25 or $50 monthly minimum payment, which is a very, very low threshold as far as being able to qualify on your own for a credit card.”

RECOMMENDED:
FREE CREDIT CHECK TOOL

Credit Report Card
Check your credit for free with this great tool from Credit.com. It offers expert advice on how to manage your credit. And you can return every 30 days for unlimited free updates.
Sign Up Here »

In addition, students can even claim projected future earnings – like from a summer job or work-study program – as income when they sign up, the report said. Experts say this is particularly concerning because in many cases, that’s guaranteeing debt with money they don’t have.

These days, millions of college students leave school with large amounts of credit card debt in their names as well as tens of thousands of dollars or more in outstanding student loans, and these two concerns make it extremely difficult for many to establish any sort of financial independence soon after they graduate from school.

[Student Loans: Research and compare options for student loans at Credit.com]

For this reason, experts caution that students should do all they can to avoid racking up sizable debts while still in college, because they may not have the financial ability or acumen to properly handle these accounts.

Waiting until they get out of college to start borrowing on credit cards for anything beyond an emergency is usually a better course of action for students.

Image: Joe Shlabotnik, via Flickr

Despite CARD Act Doomsday Predictions, Credit Card Profits Jump

Posted by Ben Popken | Credit Card Blog | Wednesday 29 February 2012 9:00 am

When the CARD Act was getting passed, the banks moaned over how having to deal with tighter consumer protection laws was going to kill their business.  It turns out that those fears might have been a tad overblown. A new report from Nilson shows that since the legislation was enacted, profits at most of the credit card issuers actually shot up.

Among the provisions in the Act were items like banks weren’t allowed to raise interest rates on existing balances, payments had to be applied to balances with the highest interest-rate first, and they couldn’t change around the date your bill was due. It had to be the same every month. Pretty sensible stuff, right?

[Credit Check Tool: Try Credit.com's Free Credit Report Card]

FREE TOOL:
CHECK YOUR CREDIT

Credit.com’s Credit Report Card
Check your credit bureau profile for free with this great tool. See your detailed credit evaluation, expert advice on managing your credit, and unlimited free updates every 30 days.
Get Started Here »

Well, the banks argued that these rules—and others—would really cut into their profits and that they would have no choice but to give out credit to fewer people. They also started adding in new fees to make up for the lost money. Bank of America tried to start charging customers a $5 monthly fee just for holding onto a debit card. The backlash on that was so big they were forced to retreat and drop the fee, but other fees, like increased fees for checking accounts, stuck. In fact, free checking has all but disappeared at the big banks, with the availability dropping from 96% in 2009 to 34.6% in 2011, according to American Banker. The banks threatened that the Durbin amendment’s cap on interchange fees – the fees they charge merchants for processing your card transactions – would mean they would have to curtail free checking, and then made good on that promise.

Despite the new restrictions, the credit card issuers made out just fine. According to the report, JPMorgan Chase profits are up to $4.54 billion from $2.87 billion, American Express is up to $2.68 billion from $2.23 billion, and Discover is up to $3.35 billion from $1.13 billion. However, the number one issuer, Bank of America, dropped from $6.98 billion to $5.79 billion, and Citigroup, ranked sixth, went down from $2.1 billion to $.11 billion.

[Related Article: Card Fees Surpass Interest Revenue, Will Get Worse Warns Analyst]

“Over the past two years, we’ve seen issuers add fees, increase interest rates on some cards (particularly on subprime lenders), and add new revenue streams to make up for the losses due to regulation,” said Beverly Harzog, Credit.com’s credit card expert. “The lenders just found other ways to make revenue, which is what a for-profit company has to do to survive.”

“I think that the CARD Act was necessary because it prevented some predatory practices by lenders,” she added. “The credit card environment is a much safer place now, especially for consumers who revolve a balance.”

It turns out that protecting consumers from lender excesses isn’t so bad for business after all.

[Related Article: How the Credit CARD Act of 2009 Affects You]

Image: jurvetson, via Flickr.com

CARD Act Loophole Number 73 – Student Loans are Income, Apparently

Posted by JohnUlzheimer | Credit Card Blog | Tuesday 14 September 2010 9:30 am

Student-loans-are-income The CARD Act requires that lenders now take steps to ensure that their applicants have some sort of ability to pay their debt obligations. The fact that it took a Federal law to accomplish this is a head-scratcher for sure. The question is, how are lenders doing this and how are they navigating around and through the requirement?

First off, your credit reports don’t contain your salary, so that’s a dead end. Second, your credit risk scores are not designed to predict capacity to pay, but are rather designed to predict the likelihood of you paying so that’s a dead end too. And lastly, trusting what you put on your credit application as “income” has proven to be unreliable, so that’s not really an option either.

This is certainly a capacity conundrum. And, since the world of credit is not without humor, I gladly bring you CARD Act loophole number 73: Student loans and the “no cards for those under 21” rule. A student loan is a real loan with strange terms. It’s issued by a bank and is sometimes federally guaranteed. The monies are generally disbursed quarterly or each semester to coincide with the school’s preferred method of slicing up the school year. The loans are meant to go toward funding tuition and college related costs.

What allows student loans to become a loophole to the CARD Act capacity to pay provision is the fact that most student loans are paid to the student rather than to the school directly. Then the student uses it to pay for tuition and books and other school expenses, or at least that’s the plan. I know people who used their student loans for expenses that would never be confused with scholastic expenses.

And if what we’re hearing is true, credit card issuers are considering student loans to be income rather than a liability. It seems to make sense to do so considering there is no immediate obligation to pay back a student loan, and by the time the loan enters the payback period the student will likely be employed. But still, if 100% of the loan is meant to be paid to the school, how can it be income?


John Ulzheimer – Credit scoring and credit reporting expert and author, John is the President of Consumer Education for Credit.com. Formerly with Equifax and Fair Isaac, John shares his unique insight of the inner workings of credit scoring models and the credit reporting industry on CreditBloggers.com.

CARD Act Loophole Number 73 – Student Loans are Income, Apparently

Posted by JohnUlzheimer | Credit Card Blog | Tuesday 14 September 2010 9:30 am

Student-loans-are-income The CARD Act requires that lenders now take steps to ensure that their applicants have some sort of ability to pay their debt obligations. The fact that it took a Federal law to accomplish this is a head-scratcher for sure. The question is, how are lenders doing this and how are they navigating around and through the requirement?

First off, your credit reports don’t contain your salary, so that’s a dead end. Second, your credit risk scores are not designed to predict capacity to pay, but are rather designed to predict the likelihood of you paying so that’s a dead end too. And lastly, trusting what you put on your credit application as “income” has proven to be unreliable, so that’s not really an option either.

This is certainly a capacity conundrum. And, since the world of credit is not without humor, I gladly bring you CARD Act loophole number 73: Student loans and the “no cards for those under 21” rule. A student loan is a real loan with strange terms. It’s issued by a bank and is sometimes federally guaranteed. The monies are generally disbursed quarterly or each semester to coincide with the school’s preferred method of slicing up the school year. The loans are meant to go toward funding tuition and college related costs.

What allows student loans to become a loophole to the CARD Act capacity to pay provision is the fact that most student loans are paid to the student rather than to the school directly. Then the student uses it to pay for tuition and books and other school expenses, or at least that’s the plan. I know people who used their student loans for expenses that would never be confused with scholastic expenses.

And if what we’re hearing is true, credit card issuers are considering student loans to be income rather than a liability. It seems to make sense to do so considering there is no immediate obligation to pay back a student loan, and by the time the loan enters the payback period the student will likely be employed. But still, if 100% of the loan is meant to be paid to the school, how can it be income?


John Ulzheimer – Credit scoring and credit reporting expert and author, John is the President of Consumer Education for Credit.com. Formerly with Equifax and Fair Isaac, John shares his unique insight of the inner workings of credit scoring models and the credit reporting industry on CreditBloggers.com.

Business Credit Cards: Are They Worth It?

Posted by Gerri_Detweiler | Credit Card Blog | Wednesday 1 September 2010 5:19 pm

Watch your mailbox. You could be getting applications for small business credit cards – even if you aren’t a business owner. A recent Wall Street Journal article points out that card issuers appear to be increasing their marketing of business cards – even to consumers who work for someone else. Sometimes camouflaged in vague terms like “professional” cards, these cards come with a serious disadvantage for the cardholder:

Business credit cards are not covered by the Credit CARD Act.

 

That means issuers can raise rates with little advance notice (and apply them retroactively), charge higher penalty fees, play with floating due dates, and do all those fun things they used to do with consumer credit cards before those tactics were outlawed. 

So why on earth would anyone want a small business credit card? Believe it or not, there are a few good reasons:

Business Card Pros:

Protect your personal credit scores. With the notable exception of Capital One, which has chosen to report business card activity on personal credit reports, most business credit cards aren't reported on personal credit reports unless you default. That means if your business can't afford to pay the bill in full each month, the fact that you are carrying a balance won't weigh down your personal credit scores. (Speaking of credit scores, you should expect to see an inquiry on at least one of your personal credit reports, since most of these cards require a personal credit check.)

Separate your business and personal finances: If you actually do own a business, keeping your business and personal purchases separate can be crucial for tax purposes. Having a dedicated business card makes this easier, though another alternative would be to use a personal card strictly for business purchases. Again, though, the activity on a personal card affects your personal credit scores, for better or for worse. 

Rich rewards:  You may find richer rewards on some small business credit cards. American Express, for example, is well known for both catering to small businesses, as well as offering solid rewards. The CitiBusiness AAdvantage Visa card gives 30,000 AAdvantage bonus miles if you make $750 in purchases the first four months. That's not hard to do if you are funding a new business.

Business Card Cons

Open yourself to the old tricks and traps. You can read our Consumer Guide to the Credit CARD Act here if you want more details about the practices that Congress banned on consumer cards. But I'll say it again: The CARD Act does not apply to business accounts. And that includes cards marketed to non-business owners as “professional” cards – at least for the time being. (I can see the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau having fun with this one.)

Note: Bank of America has stated they will extend many of the Credit CARD Act provisions to their business cards. A Capital One spokesperson is quoted in the WSJ article as saying that Capital One has applied many CARD Act protections to its business cards, but when I look at their web site, their card offers still list penalty fees that are now illegal on consumer cards.

We've said it before and we'll say it again. Just because the CARD Act protections are in place doesn't mean we can rest easy. There are still plenty of traps to watch out for.

 

 

Gerri Detweiler – Personal finance author and Credit Advisor for Credit.com, Gerri contributes budgeting, debt recovery and savings information online. She is also the co-author of a new ebook, Business Credit Success: Get on the Financing Fast Track.

 

Seasons of temperate zones Wordpress Theme