You are here: Home / Archives for Mortgage Loans

Obama Administration Launches Another Mortgage Program

February 2, 2012 By

In his State of the Union address earlier this month, President Barack Obama outlined what he called a “Blueprint for an America Built to Last,” and a major part of that plan includes another mortgage refinancing program.

The president’s plan includes “broad based refinancing,” which is designed specifically to help consumers who have seen the value of their homes slip below the amount they still owe on their home loans, as long as they have been responsible in continuing to pay their bills, the White House said. Borrowers who are current on their mortgages will be given the chance to avoid some red tape when attempting to refinance their current home loans to make them more affordable. Through the plan, underwater homeowners will be able to save an average of $3,000 per year on their home loan payments.

FREE TOOL:
CHECK YOUR CREDIT
Credit.com’s Credit Report Card
Check your credit bureau profile for free with this great tool. See your detailed credit evaluation, expert advice on managing your credit, and unlimited free updates every 30 days.
Get Started Here »

[Credit Calculator: Use Credit.com's Free Credit Report Card]

“There are more than 10 million homeowners across the country right now who, because of an unprecedented decline in home prices that is no fault of their own, owe more on their mortgage than their homes are worth,” Obama said during a speech to unveil the plan in Falls Church, Virginia. “It means your mortgage, your house is underwater.”

The other major aspect of the plan is the creation of Homeowner Bill of Rights. This will create a single set of lending standards so that both borrowers and mortgage lenders are able to better understand the rules. For example, this includes a simpler mortgage disclosure form that will make it easier for borrowers to understand the terms of the loan they’re seeking, and tells them everything they need to know about all fees and penalties associated with their new account. It will also set guidelines for lenders that prevent conflicts of interest, provide support for responsible homeowners when their property is in foreclosure and protect homeowners against improper seizures that includes the right to appeal.

[Featured Products: Research and Compare Mortgage Rates at Credit.com]

In the past few years, the federal government has unveiled a number of other mortgage and refinance assistance programs designed to help homeowners with various economic problems related to their home loans. However, these programs were often criticized as being too difficult for even the most troubled borrowers to qualify for, and as a consequence, helped far fewer Americans stay in their homes than were originally intended.

Filed Under: Credit Card Blog Tagged With: , , , , , ,

Will Obama’s Mortgage Plan Work?

January 25, 2012 By

If you’re a homeowner who is struggling to keep up with a mortgage you can’t afford, or wondering whether to continue to stay and pay on a home that is deeply underwater, you may have seen another glimmer of hope in yesterday’s news about more proposals to address the housing crisis.

Early Wednesday, preliminary details of a proposed mortgage settlement between five big banks, state attorneys general and the Obama administration, all of whom have been negotiating for months now, were released.

Under the proposed settlement, five of the largest banks would allocate $25 billion (not all in cash) to be used to refinance or modify mortgages, as well as provide principal reduction for some homeowners. Some of the settlement funds would go to state foreclosure relief programs, and a portion would be used to provide restitution for homeowners who were the victims of abusive foreclosure tactics. Those homeowners would get checks averaging roughly $2000; no doubt amounting to insult after the injury they’ve gone through while losing their homes.

FREE TOOL:
CHECK YOUR CREDIT
Credit.com’s Credit Report Card
Check your credit bureau profile for free with this great tool. See your detailed credit evaluation, expert advice on managing your credit, and unlimited free updates every 30 days.
Get Started Here »

The Center for Responsible Lending, an advocacy group that has been raising concerns about mortgage abuses since the beginning of the housing crisis, said the proposal wasn’t perfect but did “represent an important step forward in addressing foreclosure abuses” by putting an end to robo-signing and servicer abuses, and by promoting “more sustainable mortgage modifications.” Other activist groups are urging a postponement until further investigation.

No deal has been finalized.

[Related Article: Underwater On Your Home? Your Six Options]

The President’s Plan

Later that evening, President Obama raised the housing crisis in his State of the Union address. He made two proposals to help the market:

  • The opportunity for “every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low rates.  No more red tape.  No more runaround from the banks. “
  • Calling on the “Attorney General to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorney[s] general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis.” It will include expanded “investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis.”

No specific details of the refinance proposal were released last night, but many are skeptical that the program will go far enough, or that Congress will approve additional measures to help homeowners. TheStreet.com says that analysts are already calling the plan “dead on arrival.” Even if the President is able to expand refinancing opportunities, the sobering fact is that some 11 million homeowners owe more than their homes are worth, and their average negative equity is $65,000, according to CoreLogic. By comparison, $25 billion is a drop in the bucket.

However, neither the initial details of the settlement, nor the President’s announcement, gave struggling homeowners any specific action they can take to try to get help now; any reason to believe that they will be eligible for help so they can keep their homes; or that the housing market will recover anytime soon. Instead, they’re left to keep hanging in there, hoping things might be different this time around.

[Credit Calculator: Use Credit.com's Free Credit Report Card]

Why Can’t the Housing Crisis Be More Like the Banking Crisis?

If the government approached the housing crisis the way it did the banking crisis, things might be different, says former TARP General Inspector Neil Barofsky. In this video interview with the American Banker, he says, “They went all in. No cap on resources, tapping every available resource…trillions and trillions of dollars.” But “when it came to the housing market,” he says, “it just wasn’t there.” Comparing the help the banks received under TARP to what homeowners haven’t received, he pulls no punches: “they have a lot more sympathy toward the larger financial institutions, frankly, than to the homeowner on Main Street.”

Once again, the word to struggling homeowners is to sit tight. Hopefully, help is coming. But no word on what happens if it doesn’t.

[Featured Products: Research and Compare Mortgage Rates at Credit.com]

Image: trint, via Flickr.com

Filed Under: Credit Card Blog Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

A Subprime Pioneer’s Notes on the Financial Crisis She Predicted

May 9, 2011 By

HousingCrisis_Justus_Hayes_CCFlickrKathleen Engel started to notice something funny happening with home loans in 1999. She lived in Shaker Heights, Ohio, just a few blocks from the city of Cleveland. Out of nowhere, she’d found herself inundated with offers from loan brokers. They called on the phone, left flyers on her porch, sent her direct mail.

All the brokers were offering home equity loans. Engel’s neighbors were flooded with the same offers. When Engel called about the loans, she discovered a pattern: many loans offered low introductory interest rates that skyrocketed after just a few months; others contained costly balloon payments.

[Article: New Federal Rule Protects Benefits from Garnishment]

These loans were designed to fail, Engel realized. Within months, people on her block started losing their homes.

“I started asking, ‘Why are people making these loans?’ It didn’t make sense,” she says. “They were unsustainable from the get-go.”

Engel was a law professor at Cleveland State University. She became one of the first academics in the country to recognize the problem of subprime loans, the monster now known to be responsible for much of the 2007 recession, the largest economic downturn since the Great Depression.

[Article: Finally, Bank Villains Are Named]

Now Engel’s research has culminated in a new book, “The Subprime Virus.” It documents how Wall Street financial firms caused the subprime mortgage bubble, and the recession that followed, by allowing their short-term desire for profits and bonuses overwhelm concerns about the long term health of their own institutions, Engel found. They did it by controlling all aspects of the market, from individual loan officers all the way up to the investors in complicated securities swaps, and convincing Congress and federal regulators to look the other way.

“The investment banks like to portray themselves as just innocent middlemen,” says Engel, who is now a law professor at Suffolk University in Boston. “That’s just not true. They made the market. They were in control.”

The Early Days »

Image: Justus Hayes, via Flickr.com

Filed Under: Credit Card Blog Tagged With: , , , , , , ,

Deutsche Bank Sued for Fraud; Billions at Stake

May 5, 2011 By

The United States and the city of Los Angeles filed two different lawsuits against a German Bank this week. The federal lawsuit accuses Deutsche Bank of mortgage fraud.

Meanwhile, the city alleges that “Deutsche Bank has become one of the largest slumlords in the City of Los Angeles.”

In the federal lawsuit, U.S. Attorney for southern New York Preet Bharara accuses Deutsche Bank of defrauding American taxpayers of millions, and potentially billions, of dollars. The bank and its U.S.-based subsidiary, MortgageIT, received insurance from the Federal Housing Administration for more than 39,000 home loans, worth over $5 billion, according to the complaint, filed Tuesday in New York’s Southern District Court.

[Free Tool: Obtain your Identity Risk Score from Credit.com]

But there was a problem: many of those loans never qualified for government insurance in the first place, according to the suit.

“Deutsche Bank ignored every type of red flag and breached every duty of due diligence before underwriting thousands of federally insured mortgages,” Bharara said in a press release. “While the homes the defendants issued loans for may have been built on solid ground, the defendants’ lending practices were built on quicksand.”

In the scam, MortgageIT’s employees allegedly lied on the applications, winning federal insurance for mortgages in which borrowers failed to state their income or make downpayments in accordance with federal insurance rules. With the government promising to compensate investors if the loans failed, MortgageIT was able to charge investors higher prices for the loans, thus allegedly earning themselves more money on the deals.

Of the 39,000 mortgages for which MortgageIT won federal insurance, 3,100 have already failed, costing American taxpayers $386 million, according to the lawsuit.

“(T)hese lenders put millions of dollars of taxpayer funds at risk and violated the integrity of this important program by making false certifications to HUD,” Tony West, chief of the Justice Department’s civil division, said in a press release.

The losses so far may be just the tip of the iceberg. The problem with lenders filing fraudulent applications for FHA insurance was first uncovered in a report by the agency’s inspector general, which found that fully half of all mortgages insured by the federal government never met qualifications for the insurance in the first place. That could force taxpayers to pay over $8.4 billion in fraudulent claims, as we reported in March.

If that ratio holds true in Deutsche Bank’s case, that would mean the bank may have fraudulently received federal insurance for $2.5 billion worth of loans. With the U.S. attorney seeking treble damages, that translates to a potential fine of $7.5 billion for Deutsche Bank.

In Los Angeles, the city’s lawsuit accuses Deutsche Bank of failing to maintain more than 2,200 foreclosed properties. The suit also alleges that the bank wrongfully evicted thousands of people.

“We must fight blight by holding banks accountable when they create vacant nuisance properties that pose threats to our residents and destroy the quality of life in our neighborhoods, and we must protect vulnerable tenants from illegal evictions,” City Attorney Carmen Trutanich said in a press release.

Deutsche Bank responded by saying the city is suing the wrong party. According to comments made by a spokesman to American Banker, the bank serves as the trustee on the loans in question; and a different company actually services the loans, and is responsible for evictions and maintaining foreclosed properties.

Deutsche Bank did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

[Related article: Government May Owe $8.4 Billion on Fraudulent Loans]

Image © Andreas Weber | Dreamstime.com

Filed Under: Credit Card Blog Tagged With: , , , , , ,

New Rewards, Penalties for Mortgage Mods

May 5, 2011 By

Having trouble refinancing your mortgage, even though you meet all the requirements set by the federal government? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-owned mortgage giants, announced recently that they will use cash to encourage loan servicers to modify loans, and impose new penalties against companies that break the rules.

Loan servicers that complete a modification application within six months of the borrower becoming delinquent will get $500. Those who miss the deadline will pay $500. After that, servicers that make a successful modification will get between $400 and $1,400, depending on how quickly they complete the process.

“This initiative will direct servicers to reach families earlier, communicate more frequently and clearly, and provide relief,” Michael J. Williams, president of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which oversees Fannie and Freddie, said in a press release.

The final rules will not be announced until the second quarter of 2011. They will include requirements that servicers respond to borrowers’ phone calls and emails within a certain time, and deadlines for how quickly servicers must give notice of delinquency and inspect houses facing foreclosure.

[Related article: Federal Agencies Push for More Mortgage Modifications]

Loan servicers act as middlemen in the mortgage process. They receive checks from homeowners, pay the taxes and insurance, and pass profits on to investors. Unlike investors and homeowners, however, servicers actually earn higher profits when a home slides into foreclosure, reducing their incentive to modify loans and keep homeowners in their houses, according to research and testimony by the Center for Responsible Lending, which we covered here.

The action by Fannie and Freddie is not the first attempt by the federal government to change servicers’ behavior. The Obama Administration hoped the Home Affordable Modification Program would encourage servicers to modify more loans. The program was a spectacular failure, mostly because its incentives were too small compared to how much money servicers continue to make from foreclosures, according to a Congressional Oversight Panel report covered here.

[Related article: Federal Fannie and Freddie Changes Likely Won't Come Soon]

Fannie and Freddie’s goals for their servicing initiative appear to be more modest by comparison. Gone is talk from the Obama administration of saving four million homeowners from foreclosure (at most, HAMP actually will prevent 800,000 foreclosures, the oversight panel found). Instead, the agencies hope homeowners will simply gain better information about where they stand in the process.

The initiative “should give homeowners a greater understanding of the process and faster resolution by requiring earlier contact, more frequent communication, and prompt decisions,” Edward J. DeMarco, the FHFA’s acting director, said in a press release.

Image: James Thompson, via Flickr

Filed Under: Credit Card Blog Tagged With: , , , , ,
« Older Posts

Powered by Yahoo! Answers